What does complexity theory offer business? |
|
|
Page 2 of 7 To what extent can we go with complexity thinking? A good starting place might be to consider the evolution of modern thought, beginning with The Black Plague. Between the 1300s and 1700s the black plague swept much of the world killing around 1/3rd of the people on the planet. The social pressure of so many dying opened minds to concepts like bacteria and the potential of medical science which helped eradicated the plague, reduced the relative power of intuition, mysticism and faith - greatly increasing 'complexity'. The ensuing "Age of Enlightenment" lead thinking to be heavily influenced by reductionist 'cause and effect', linear control style thinking. Many argue this pre-occupation has lead us toward the idea that a salvation for everything (including our environment, institutions and societies) can be found in scientism. (Lawrence 1994). As evidence of how far cause and effect salvation for every problem has been taken, consider anti-discrimination laws. In the US, a fat man successfully sues a restaurant chain for discrimination against fat people because he could not fit his buttocks into their chairs! What was the cause of his butt not fitting? Discrimination of course! Salvation for being fat has been found in the unfair practices of others, with no need for the 'revelation' that being over weight can preclude you from being able to participate in certain aspects of life. Lessons from the restaurant. Whilst this may be absurd, it can be fairly argued that an ability to control "cause and effect" is the dominant underpinning of western thinking – whether as obvious as in science, as subtle as in management or as distorted as in anti-discrimination. How did this come about?From the time of the black plague (less than 500 years ago or 1% of human evolution) Kant, Hegel, Mead and many others have sought to help us frame, explain or understand the nature of the universe and wrestled with the paradoxes that human behaviour poses to reductionist linear logic.
But if cause and effect were to remain the underpinning process, how then, do we allow for truly novel innovation or creativity? |
|||||||||
| < Prev |
|---|
| 26.05.2008 |
| Opportunities in the Machine to Machine (M2M) Market |
| 22.04.2008 |
| The Tools of our Trade |
| 22.03.2011 |
| Strategy Development Meeting Tip #4 |
| 22.03.2011 |
| Strategy Development Meeting Tip #3 |
| 22.03.2011 |
| Strategy Development Meeting Tip #2 |
| 15.04.2008 |
| The Ideal Strategy Conference |
| 13.04.2008 |
| Complimentary Intellectual Property |
| 08.04.2008 |
| Conception of Strategy |
| 08.04.2008 |
| Salary Review |
| 02.04.2008 |
| Ambit Recruitment |



